首页> 外文OA文献 >Care ethics and cloning: a speculative literary critique of human biotechnology
【2h】

Care ethics and cloning: a speculative literary critique of human biotechnology

机译:护理伦理与克隆:对人类生物技术的投机性文学批评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Debates about human cloning are typically argued within a framework of individual rights and justice that promote a particular view of human independence. As a result, the cloning debate is impoverished because it fails to adequately consider human interdependence. Rather than considering whether we have a right to clone, feminist care ethics offers the question, is it caring to clone? To explore questions of social and political care ethics within the cloning debate, this thesis examines two contemporary speculative novels, Margaret Atwood\u27s Oryx and Crake (2003) and Kazuo Ishiguro\u27s Never Let Me Go (2005), which represent uses of human cloning that function as an ineffective cure for the social and political care that is missing in the U.S. and the U.K. These novels also suggest that the ethics of care as a social and political theory may be advanced by broadening civic discourse to involve the arts and humanities.
机译:关于人类克隆的辩论通常在促进个人对人类独立看法的个人权利和正义的框架内进行辩论。结果,克隆辩论陷入贫困,因为它未能充分考虑人与人之间的相互依存关系。女权主义护理伦理学没有考虑我们是否有权克隆,而是提出了一个问题,是否愿意克隆?为了探讨克隆辩论中的社会和政治关怀伦理问题,本论文研究了两本当代投机小说,玛格丽特·阿特伍德\ uys and Crake(2003)和石zu一夫\ n Never Let Me Go(2005),它们代表了人类的使用克隆这种功能无法有效地治愈美国和英国所缺少的社会和政治护理。这些小说还暗示,可以通过扩大公民讨论范围,使艺术和人文学科参与进来,将护理伦理作为一种社会和政治理论来发展。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tweed, Laurel A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号